Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Z CAM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:50, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Z CAM[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are not good. Only one even looks like one. But the window for draftification has passed. Content appears to have been split off from ZCam. The relevant guideline is WP:NORG, so being part of news stories is not enough. (NPP action) Usedtobecool ☎️ 10:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ☎️ 10:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Technology. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Only the first source appears relevant at all, and the article isn't even about the company or its technology, but a brief digression about the US-China trade war. Everything here could be covered better in the main ZCam article. I could also support a merge to that article. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The subjects are not related. Other than being similarly-named brands revolving around digital camera products, they have nothing to do with each other. I have no interest in weighing in on this deletion, other than to express my opposition to re-adding this to ZCam. Dancter (talk) 03:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.