Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuvasri Lakshmi (2nd nomination)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and salt. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:38, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yuvasri Lakshmi[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Yuvasri Lakshmi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actress, minor unnamed roles just like the last one and not a single source included is reliable - all wikis, user generated, wikipedia itself or completely unreliable (indiaglitz, etc...) half of the credits listed here aren't even on her imdb profile and even if they were, are irrelevant. So pretty much per the last AFd. Praxidicae (talk) 15:59, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete A news search shows not a lot. For the record, I declined a WP:G4 nomination as the article was longer and used different sources to the version deleted at AfD round 1; hence I felt a new AfD was required. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)Gee, ya think? It's almost as if we've had this exact discussion before. Praxidicae (talk) 16:17, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've had worse. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:19, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, because Wikipedia was founded on bureaucracy for the sake of bureaucracy.Praxidicae (talk) 16:22, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and salt Horrible sources and repeated recreation are not a good mix. Trillfendi (talk) 16:12, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Must not Delete I have a lot of references regarding the article and its importance. Even if u delete it by now it will be recreated when she is even more famous because she has been acting in much films continuously. The roles she made aren't petty roles but they are the major supporting roles of the films. If u had watched the film u can understand it very easily because she had a film completely revolving around her, then the other characters she did travels throughout the film. In Tamil cinema, many films has unnamed characters which had almost equal importance that of the major role. She is just 19 by now, and has been signed for many films such as Appa 2 and the remakes of Appa, the malayalam version of it, then many more.--Wiki tamil 100 (talk) 16:25, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://getlink.pro/collection?term=yuvasri%20lakshmi%20interview--Wiki tamil 100 (talk) 16:34, 29 April 2019 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yuvasri_Lakshmi. She has also acted in serials and programs in SUN TV. Many SUN TV stars have their articles for their supporting roles in serials and if u want to delete thi s article as she is a supporting child actress, then u must delete many articles of Tamil cinema stars.--Wiki tamil 100 (talk) 16:48, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you realize that if an administrator salts the page as the salt template on it says, the page cannot and will not be able to be recreated, even if she did become more famous. Trillfendi (talk) 17:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Small addendum: not be able to be recreated by a non-admin. Salting just means only an admin can recreate it. ...and sometimes they do, as is obvious from the drama currently unfolding at ANI/ARBCOM. Bakazaka (talk) 18:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • See she is an child artist, she has heights to touch. She didn't do any minor roles, actually all the roles she did was the major supporting roles. Tamil artists most of them were "none" at the time of their entry, for example we can take the leading actors of Tamil cine field most of them emerged from supporting roles. None of them can directly make the top role before acting supportive roles. But Yuvasri is already enough famous by these supportive roles.
    Then my next point is Thulasi_Nair, she isnt famous at all. She just acted 2 films at the age of same 16. None of the thing is positive to have a wiki article on her name. Her mother is an famous actress, maybe this plays a role for getting an article on her name. She was just nominated for awards but Yuvasri has won two awards. By how Yuvasri won positive reviews for her performances in Amma Kanakku, Appa and Kanchana 3, like that Thulasi Nair has also won positive reviews but just for a single movie. The whole article of Thulasi Nair speaks about that review of the film Kadal. If Yuvasri's article is deleted, then that article must be deleted, and many like these articles must be deleted.--Wiki tamil 100 (talk) 17:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • If you'd like to nominate that article for deletion, see instructions at WP:AFDHOWTO. This is a discussion about one article, not other articles in the encyclopedia. Bakazaka (talk) 18:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as we have to go through the motions. This is a repeatedly recreated article of a subject who has already been shown to be non-notable through a community consensus process. Bakazaka (talk) 18:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't Delete it. She isn't a non-notable artist. She is famous throughout our regions of Pondicherry and has a good support from Tamil Kollywood industry. I think none of them here belongs to any region of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry. Most of them here are unaware of Kollywood. Her characters in Appa, Ammakanakku and a new ghost film Kanchana series were well known to audiences in our region.----Mannargudi (talk) 12:56, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete ANYBIO/NACTOR fail. ∯WBGconverse 13:56, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think so none of them are tamil men to understand this, as said by the previous user. It should not be deleted. May be u all can get the idea from many Tamil users of Wikipedia. Until then u better eave this article remain.--Wiki tamil 100 (talk) 14:23, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • A Better idea is better leave it with the consultant wikiprojects such as : Wikiproject India, Puducherry etc--Wiki tamil 100 (talk) 14:41, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Wiki tamil 100, dude, I can read Tamil. So take your spamming elsewhere. ∯WBGconverse 14:59, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Wiki tamil 100: This is just a reminder that you as an individual get only one !vote in any AFD, regardless of the account name or IP address. Trying to add more than one in an attempt to sway the outcome will not help your case. Praxidicae (talk) 15:57, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wiki tamil 100 I'll put it in easier words for you to understand. This seems like an okay link from a reliable source - [[1]. We need more references from reliable sources, a list of some of which are provided at WP:ICTFFAQ. Please add more such references to the article - and they may be in any language - and we can consider salvaging it. Jupitus Smart 16:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • A new news - Kanchana 3 director and actor Raghava Lawrence revealed that Yuvasri not only made the role of that child but also did the ghosty appearances (devil role) in the film in the background. She also did that role on behalf of Kanchana 3 cast in the show in Sun TV in Kanchana 3 Kondattam (Celebration). He also told that she has lots of talents and had recommended her to many film directors. Then he further added that on seeing Yuvasri, he came to the idea of opening an institute named Kanmani Institute (his mother name) to reveal the unknown talents from the state in Kollywood. For reference i can show only the youtube video of that celebration that Sun network will release shortly today or tmrw.[1]--Wiki tamil 100 (talk) 05:39, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://caminane.org/kanchana-3-kondattam-01-05-2019-sun-tv-may-day-special-show/
  • Thank u Jupitus for that article. I have provided references from Indian express of tamil version (reliable), Dinamalar (reliable newspaper daily), Times of India and etc.--Wiki tamil 100 (talk) 06:07, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lot had changed since the last nomination, so the result must vary from the last one.--Wiki tamil 100 (talk) 07:15, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Soft delete - she seems to have had only minor supporting roles - doesn't meet WP:NACTOR - Refund if she has significant roles in multiple notable films in the future -Epinoia (talk) 18:35, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- additional Comment - the impassioned pleas not to delete this article suggest that there is an element of promotion involved, which qualifies it for deletion under WP:SPIP - Epinoia (talk) 20:11, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yuvasri_Lakshmi_(2nd_nomination)&oldid=1011889554"