Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuva Sena

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yuva Sena[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:GNG.The subject is already covered in a section of its parent organization Shiv Sena. No much references available. The information available on the Shiv Sena's page would be enough. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 15:21, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination . Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 13:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:25, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:25, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:25, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may well be right, yet I do see quite a bit of coverage on the Google News link and we do have articles on notable youth wings of parties, such as Young Republicans? Based on the Gnews coverage linked above, I would disagree what the statement "No much references available." They seem to be available! Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Shawn in Montreal: I agree with you, but the article I have nominated has no significant coverage in the news as Young Republicans has. I think that a section in the parent article would be enough. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 15:31, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And you've clicked on the Afd-generated Gnews link above, right? Just curious. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It would be possible to merge this article, which would avoid having the same information in 2 places. However the youth party seems to be notable on its own and by policy its article should not be deleted.Borock (talk) 15:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I can find numerous references in reliable sources such as [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Searching for "Yuva Sena" at Indian version of google emits 300 thousands results. Seems to pass WP:GNG easily. Hitro talk 18:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep yes, I'll !vote too. While I would otherwise yield to your superior knowledge as an Indian Wikipedian, based on WP:ORG, we do seem to have a bona fide article topic, within Category:Youth wings of political parties in India. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:08, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Hitro's research. Yvarta (talk) 00:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination . Please close the discussion. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 13:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.