Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yusuke Hatano

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yusuke Hatano[edit]

Yusuke Hatano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability problems. No reliable independent sources with significant coverage. Google News search returns no hits [1]. Vanjagenije (talk) 07:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:30, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:30, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete since I cannot find any substantive coverage, but I could be persuaded if anybody could do a sweep for sources in Japanese. Vanamonde (talk) 07:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:51, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep Based on the article as it now stands, subject seems to be involved in a number of fairly high profile projects. Where the article falls short is in demonstrating the extent and the importance of his involvement. That said, I would be reluctant to scrap it outright if it could be improved (perhaps by someone with access to the relevant Japanese or Chinese-language sources). Tigercompanion25 (talk) 04:16, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:18, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.