Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuri George Jan Pool
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 22:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yuri George Jan Pool (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Working--but not notable--musician. Not a member of any well-known band, no significant solo works, and no claims or reliable sources attesting otherwise. Part of a walled garden created by one editor's sole contributions, including The McCartney Years (band), Out Of Thin Air (album) and London Music Award. CalendarWatcher (talk) 23:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Addendum: I would like to officially add Out Of Thin Air (album) to this nomination. I had added a prod tag to it, but as User:MacGyverMagic has 'resolved' the tagging by redirecting it to Yuri George Jan Pool, it seems only fitting to make things explicit. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 23:47, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 23:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This article is not a walled garden. Enough outside references that are reliable as well as verifiable oppose this claim. The artist in question is in fact notable and significant with clear and easy to find press coverage in major newspapers and TV network(s) (also as referred to in the original article). In general, incorrect claims and no references are made by primary plaintiff to support his/her claim.
I am open to discuss any recommendations to improve the article.
Regards, Rickgalliard (talk) 13:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This article is in compliance with the following Wikipedia guidelines:
- WP:BAND Article #12: "Has been the the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network" Runtime 31:21 minutes, live broadcast on A-Channel on January 30, 2009.[1]
- WP:NOTABILITY ""Significant coverage"" The sources address the subject directly in detail [2]
- WP:NOTABILITY ""Reliable"" The sources indicated have editorial integrity, cf. the reliable source guideline as set out by Wikipedia (third party published sources); major newspaper.
This proves the article meets the above guidelines and should be kept live. Regards, Rickgalliard (talk) 20:13, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- ' WP:BAND Article #12: "Has been the the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network" Runtime 31:21 minutes, live broadcast on A-Channel on January 30'
- Except that it's obviously a single local television station, not a national network, and there's no evidence of any over-the-air transmission, just an on-line video.
- 'Significant coverage"" The sources address the subject directly in detail'
- Except that it's a single story from a local newspaper, its subject is the publicity stunt, and as it's only a few paragraphs in length it covers nothing in detail.
- ' The sources indicated have editorial integrity'
- Except that that clause is irrelevant if there's no coverage that's applicable. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 22:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The subject of this article is not yet notable. Fails WP:CREATIVE and therefore should be deleted. The article could be re-written and re-submitted after the artist has achieved major distribution and/or chart success. Esasus (talk) 21:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: no significant coverage in 3rd party sources, no awards, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 03:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.