Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yung Mercury (rapper)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete all g4 and a9, see previous afd. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:01, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yung Mercury (rapper)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. Zero Google news hits on name, Google web hits are either primary sources (blogs, myspace, etc) or are of unclear reliability. Might be notable one day but not now. RadioFan (talk) 15:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Should have done some additional Wiki searches before nomingating this. It meets Speedy Deletion criteria G4 as it's been deleted before (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yung Mercury) and has not significantly changed since then. RadioFan (talk) 15:37, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and SALT. There's even less here than there was before, and the previous situation didn't meet WP:MUSIC either. "Might be notable one day but not now" sums it up. Until then, given that this failed AfD about a week ago, I recommend SALT; at that hypothetical future point of notability, I think WP:Deletion review should be required. (added later) SALT the whole mess. The last AfD noted a number of "album" titles and details that were simply hoaxes -- this seems to be the same. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:48, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following album page associated with this rapper, it also lacks 3rd party reliable sources and is based completely on "confirmed" details about a forthcoming album from what appears to be a fan blog.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.