Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yumi Nakatani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 07:31, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yumi Nakatani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unfortunately, despite my best efforts, I was unable to find enough significant coverage about this voice actress. A Japanese search wasn't of much help, and the English search wasn't much better. She has only four bolded entries (for two roles) on Anime News Network, none of which were lead roles, suggesting that she does not pass WP:ENT. As she was primarily active in the 1970s onward, it's possible that some coverage exists offline, but given the lack of roles, I'm not confident that this is the case. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:08, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:08, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:08, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No ANN articles or appearances in conventions. The JA Wikipedia article is a credits dump as well with no biographical information. ja:中谷ゆみ Would be hard pressed to find encyclopedic information beyond WP:BUTITEXISTS. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:06, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 15:43, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't find enough reliable sources that mention it, I don't speak Japanese so even if these did exist I couldn't analyse the depth of the coverage. DrStrauss talk 16:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.