Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuki Amemiya

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yuki Amemiya[edit]

Yuki Amemiya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been notability tagged since 2008. Non-notable manga artist who co-wrote on 07-ghost and battle rabbits No Japanese Wikipedia article. Recommend merge to 07-Ghost her most notable manga. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:06, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:28, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete after being tagged for 9 years with no improvement, it is time to delete the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:03, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That makes no sense at all. The length of time an article has been tagged for improvement is not a rationale or reason for deletion. 104.163.154.101 (talk) 06:38, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's more that the artist hasn't produced any other notable works besides the two mentioned. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:03, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.