Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yue Guang Guang Chang
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as a duplicate of an existing article. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:54, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yue Guang Guang Chang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:Notability. Google search on the subject brings up 29 results, all of which appear to be no more than trivial references to the subject. Article is entirely unsourced. Article consists mostly of anecdotes about the subject, most of which are unverifiable and some of which are promotional/peacockery. PROD decline with insufficient assertion of notability. Five 31 story buildings does not equal notability. Delete. Safiel (talk) 18:33, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This page is roughly the same as Moonlight square, which has also been nominated for deletion (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moonlight square). The two articles were created by a student who is part of a school project organized by a professor at Nanjing Normal University. Many experienced editors are helping the students develop their editing skills. Cheers, Madalibi (talk) 03:24, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for the same reasons as indicated in the "delete" recommendations at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moonlight square, because that article describes the same housing estate as this one does. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:51, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.