Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Your Past Comes Back to Haunt You

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 22:34, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Past Comes Back to Haunt You[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable album. No charting. No reviews. No sources. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:23, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article now has two reviews, and some sources.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 13:32, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep article now sufficiently referenced to establish its notability.Dan arndt (talk) 14:55, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:10, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, I agree with the nominator: not notable. Recent references and reviews are not from reliable sources--a few mentions/reviews in some ezines/websites aren't sufficient. Drmies (talk) 02:44, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:29, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 04:56, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep This EP just about manages to have at least some notability.DrDevilFX (talk) 08:23, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.