Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Younus College of Engineering & Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:43, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Younus College of Engineering & Technology[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent reliable sources are there giving enough significant coverage to the subject to establish notability. Clearly fails WP:GNG Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 10:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 10:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 10:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 10:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 10:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:11, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lets see, an article about a private school that is referenced only to primary sources and I can't find anything in a WP:BEFORE except for a few trivial name drops in school directories. So this seems like a clear delete to me. Unless someone can provide WP:THREE in-depth, independent sources that would help it pass the notability standards for organizations. If anyone can then I'd be more then happy to change my vote. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the coverage is just the usual bare-minimum coverage. Adamant1 is correct here as is Kichu. WP:NORG failed as the organisation is not discussed in depth enough. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.