Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Films
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xclamation point 03:29, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Young Films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only reliable source that I can find is the official site.Schuym1 (talk) 22:31, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Christopher Young, the owner, might be notable as he produced 10 movies (would have to check) but that doesn't matter, as this is about his company. Even IMDB doesn't list the company, just him. Not notable enough at this time, might be easier if the author tried to find sources to establish a new article based on Christopher Young instead of the company. PHARMBOY (TALK) 22:50, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Jeremiah (talk) 23:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete In fact I think it meets the "no content" rule for speedy deletion CSD:A3, since the article consists only of references to other articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianlucas (talk • contribs) 00:38, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Undead Warrior (talk) 23:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Undead Warrior (talk) 23:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with respects to Christopher Young, your production company does not yet have your personal notability. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:18, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect If his 10 produced films are in their credits associated with Young Films, otherwise delete. rootology (C)(T) 05:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. JavierMC 09:50, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect It can't harm to have one, if the films are indeed Young Films. Otherwise, delete. (I should point out the error in the nomination, the official site is not reliable.) -- how do you turn this on 22:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.