Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Artist Award

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I'm going to enterpret Eluchil404's comment as a "weak keep" so I don't have to say "no consensus". (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Young Artist Award[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. No coverage in independent reliable sources provided or found. All coverage found is either from the organization itself or blogs. SummerPhD (talk) 05:31, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I found a little bit of coverage, but quite a bit less than I expected.[1][2] There are also a fair number of article behind paywalls that look like they might be reliable sources based on google snippets. Most mentions are fairly trivial listings as part of various people's biographies. On the one hand those aren't the kind of sources we need to build an article. On the other, they're mentioned often enough that not having an article could look like an oversight on our part since it's fairly easy to reliable source various artists having won them. Eluchil404 (talk) 09:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:56, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Temporizing Keep. Eluchil1404's comments pretty much sum up my feelings here. I notice, checking out the organization's web page, that this year's awards will be given out in less than two weeks. I see no harm, and probable benefit, to waiting to see what kind of coverage they receive. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:59, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.