Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YouPoundit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 20:42, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

YouPoundit[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the references are result of PR. No independent sources are found. Fails WP:COMPANY. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:59, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:09, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:09, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:10, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Bog-standard non-notable commerce web site. --Calton | Talk 06:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - Weak because I found hits, several of them actually. Quite a few are significant. However, these significant sources appear to either be advertising the company, or otherwise unreliable. This link is the most promising I could find, but it's only mentioned as part of an article which also discusses other startups, so it's not exactly significant coverage. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.