Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You've Come This Way Before
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Mackensen (talk) 04:44, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You've Come This Way Before[edit]
- You've Come This Way Before (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The one source calls it: "Nancy Priddy's sole, obscure solo album". Almost notable for being non-notable, but not quite. Gigs (talk) 14:49, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:40, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The allmusic review [1] is in-depth. Also reviewed by the American Record Guide, Volume 35, Issue 2, 1969, p. 590 & given the Special Merit Pick for popular music in Billboard, Nov 9, 1968. [2]. 86.44.24.94 (talk) 03:37, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:16, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep That single review plus the artist's notability are enough to warrant a pass under WP:NALBUMS. §FreeRangeFrog 22:48, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The artist's notability is irrelevant. So you are left with a single review that mostly talks about how obscure and unnoticed the album was. At the very least, this should be merged into the artist's article since it looks like that one is heading for keep. Gigs (talk) 18:43, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I know that notability is not inherited, but considering the sheer amount of album articles without a single review or reference around here, most of which are promotional, and are given a pass based on the artist's notability. At least this one has a review! §FreeRangeFrog 21:20, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The artist's notability is irrelevant. So you are left with a single review that mostly talks about how obscure and unnoticed the album was. At the very least, this should be merged into the artist's article since it looks like that one is heading for keep. Gigs (talk) 18:43, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Nancy Priddy. The all music review makes it clear that her fame as an actor is why it's being reviewed. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:50, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- That's completely untrue... 86.44.25.145 (talk) 00:53, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —cyberpower ChatLimited Access 18:56, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.