Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yottamark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango 123 (e) 04:53, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yottamark

This seems like an 1:1 copy from some marketing paper Malasa 04:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree - the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 04:20, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 04:26, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as complete ad spam per nom. Kuru ^talk 04:27, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not just copied; maybe even OCR'ed--also uses "our" M1ss1ontomars2k4 05:09, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless Yottamark lets us advertise Wikipedia on their site. --E lkman - ^(talk) 05:12, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as adspammery. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:27, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, advertising. JIP | Talk 07:50, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, advertising. --Ter e nc e Ong 15:00, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 17:42, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete adv. --Chris 22:53, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete adcruft -M^ask 01:10, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per ad. Arbusto 06:54, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, advertising--Dakota ~ ° 08:27, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.