Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yorman Landa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No consensus on a merge. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yorman Landa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable minor league player Fbdave (talk) 22:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Minnesota Twins minor league players. Doesn't meet WP:NBASE, but the coverage of his death is probably enough for a mention on that list. -IagoQnsi (talk) 23:00, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @IagoQnsi: It may be confusing, but that page is only meant for current minor league players. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:42, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete was not noteworthy before his death, his death does not make him noteworthy. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:48, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree with Muboshgu that merging to Minnesota Twins minor league players would not be appropriate, since those articles are not for former minor league players in the systems. If he has adequate coverage to meet GNG (which may include coverage subsequent to his death, but not just news reports of his death) keeping would be appropriate. But I can't find such coverage. All the coverage I see is either transactions or news reports of his death. So deleting would be appropriate. Rlendog (talk) 17:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete his death is certainly tragic, but is not enough to warrant a standalone article. As per above, merging would also not be appropriate. Lepricavark (talk) 14:09, 22 December 2016

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.