Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoko Matsugane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 07:17, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yoko Matsugane[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 04:51, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Television, Fashion, and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:28, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: A7 and G11 speedy deletion. No claim to notability and this article is very promotional. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:37, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Speedy, but still Delete: IMO this would not qualify for A7 as "has appeared on several TV shows" is a credible claim to significance, because if it turned out those roles were significant and that this could be sourced, notability would be established. However, a review of the Japanese article (via google translate), which has a list of the roles, reveals that none of them were in fact significant, so I would say that this should still be deleted for lack of notability. In regards to the G11, I don't feel that the article is unambiguously promotional as it does have a mostly encyclopedic tone. Bensci54 (talk) 16:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.