Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoketron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect has been created to List of robots in Transformers Animated as it is a viable search term. There is no consensus for the merger of any content. Mkativerata (talk) 19:03, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yoketron[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor Transformers character, extremely unlikely reliable sources exist to verify notability. Divebomb (talk) 17:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of robots in Transformers Animated. Plausible search term. --Malkinann (talk) 22:06, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No major coverage found on CBS, CNN, et cetera. Tedescoboy22 (talk) 23:51, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment You have got to be kidding me. --Divebomb (talk) 11:56, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - very minor,not notable. --Khajidha (talk) 13:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect - To the list Malkinnan mentioned. He was actually plot important. NotARealWord (talk) 07:16, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Oh, man, you know an article is in big trouble when the one and only reference is to someone's Twitter(!) Delete, no reliable sources, nothing verifiable enough to merge. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:15, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - That twitter post is a post made by the maker of the show talking about the character he made. It's valid enough as a source of info on the character, but the article does need more to be kept. 198.51.174.5 (talk) 16:53, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not even a whiff of reliably sourced notability, just fancruft from...a twitter line? Tarc (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --Allen for IPv6 18:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Twittter is this the best inclusionists can musters up as evidence for notability. Its does not matter if delete is the majority vote an inclusionist will merge it anyway.Dwanyewest (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Alright. First of all, an AFD result does not disallow further editorial actions. If it did, I probably would be blocked or at least warned by now about turning deleted articles into redirects. Second of all, the Twitter thing is not being used as evidence of notability. You can't use a statement by the creator of a show as evidence of notability of a character from said show. And last but not least, you have been told to stop dropping loaded terms like "inclusionist". It would be a good idea to do so. --Divebomb (talk) 16:07, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.