Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yohan Adhyayam Ondru (2013 tamil film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:46, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yohan Adhyayam Ondru (2013 tamil film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too soon. Unreferenced. Declined CSD. GregJackP Boomer! 11:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Due to improper article title, the AFD template has assigned a useless findsources". Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proper title:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Title and director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete for now per WP:NFF and per TOO SOON. It must be noted that the very sourcabletitle Yohan Adhyayam Ondru ALREADY redirects to notable director Gautham Menon. The article author adding "(2013 tamil film)" to title is NOT per WP:NCF and gives very poor results. We can allow back under proper title once WP:NF is met. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable, at least currently. SL93 (talk) 00:11, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The creator of the article has gone around creating a series of fake articles, this is yet another one! Editor 2050 (talk) 13:57, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
To Editor 2050, no matter what "might" have been done elsewhere, THIS topic is sourcable and NOT a fake article... but rather one with an improperly disambig'd title which is simply premature. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:32, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.