Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YoYo Games (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 16:18, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

YoYo Games[edit]

(Find video game sources: "YoYo Games" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Article lacks reliable secondary and third party sources and fails WP:Notability BlitzGreg (talk) 23:18, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Venture Beat MSDN Blog GamesIndustry.biz PocketGamer Mashable InsideMobileGames. Plenty of source I would say. You guys should at least attempt a cursory look using Google. Tsk tsk. SharkD Talk 07:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Fairly notable company, decent amount of refs, but could use more (like most articles). Fairly balanced discussion of company. Don't see compelling reason to delete. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 14:29, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as passing WP:GNG with multiple reliable independent in-depth sources, as listed by SharkD above. In addition, all the passing mentions, interviews, releases, and generic short articles to provide plenty of WP:V material. Article may lack these sources, but notability is about existence of such sources and not article quality, and finding such did not pose much trouble. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:49, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.