Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yihwa (character)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bad Romance (TV series). (non-admin closure) KCVelaga (talk) 00:32, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yihwa (character)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real-world notability whatsoever. None of the citations are to reliable sources, and none of them specifically cover the character in-depth anyway. Subject fails the WP:GNG. Entire article violates Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction. Previously redirected to Bad Romance (TV series), but twice reverted by article creator. Paul_012 (talk) 12:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Paul_012 (talk) 06:57, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AmericanAir88^(talk) 00:32, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Bad Romance (TV series) - redirecting still seems to be the valid option here. If they undo the creation of the redirect, just revert back, and report to an appropriate noticeboard if that becomes necessary. Kirbanzo (talk) 00:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT does say that AfD is one of those appropriate venues to discuss such disputed cases. At least this should establish stronger consensus. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:30, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect for reasons stated above. _signed,Rosguill^talk 22:30, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.