Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yi Bong-chool

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎ per WP:SNOW resulting from failure to WP:BEFORE. (non-admin closure) (non-admin closure) :3 F4U (they/it) 05:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yi Bong-chool[edit]

Yi Bong-chool (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:10, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, and South Korea. UtherSRG (talk) 16:10, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Would the commander of a brigade have the rank of brigadier-general? The article already has a reference to a magazine article, although it is not online. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 16:58, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. See the Korean article at ko:이봉출 Generals are usually notable. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 17:01, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as Eastmain noted there's plenty of detail on the Korean page and presumably more information can be found in other Korean sources so a pass on WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 06:35, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Clear failure of WP:BEFORE on the nominator's part, enough GNG coverage exists. Kges1901 (talk) 11:13, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Passes WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:50, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and snow close the discussion, the subject is clearly notable based on the sources in the Korean article. AryKun (talk) 07:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, seconding WP:SNOW Likely just a mistake on nom's part due to multiple transliterations of name. —siroχo 12:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.