Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yggdrasil (Mesh)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:49, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yggdrasil (Mesh)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable software project (mesh network) - only reference is its own documentation. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:28, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Without prejudice I note has some relationship to Cjdns / Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cjdns (2nd nomination) by the same article creator I believe. Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:45, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I found this but I don’t think it’s about the same thing. I can’t find any other reliable sources. Mccapra (talk) 08:14, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 21:54, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see how this meets WP:GNG. Unable to find any significant coverage in reliable sources. What Mccapra found is actually about a different Yggdrasil, the subject's Github is this [1] and that Yggdrasil mentioned in that article is this [2]. Obvious advert spam for a non notable project. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:44, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sine subject fails WP:GNG. A lot of work has obviously gone into the creation of this text - but it's all original. -The Gnome (talk) 14:19, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there’s no evidence of notability. Mccapra (talk) 14:31, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.