Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yeshimebeth T. Belay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:36, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeshimebeth T. Belay

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not independently notable outside of her company, lack WP:RS, fails WP:GNG, another promotional piece, requires deletion. Meeanaya (talk) 12:18, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Meeanaya (talk) 12:18, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Meeanaya (talk) 12:18, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethiopia-related deletion discussions. Meeanaya (talk) 12:18, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a local figure lacking the type of coverage needed to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:17, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 02:44, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 02:44, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete There are actually reliable sources - The Washington Post. However, two articles in one newspaper do not count as multiple, independent sources, so she currently does not meet WP:GNG or even WP:BASIC. I have done some editing of the article, so it is less promotional and there are more inline citations. If multiple independent sources could be found, then she might be notable. RebeccaGreen (talk) 00:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.