Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellow car rule

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 02:31, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow car rule

It is an un-encyclopedic article written in an informal tone about a non-notable topic. The article would require a major rewrite in order to be acceptable. Mars2035 22:23, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:NFT. Mystache 23:00, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nonnotable variation of Punch buggy. NawlinWiki 23:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as patent nonsense - iridescenti (talk to me!) 23:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "Yellow mini" could be mentioned as a variant in Punch buggy (see this Independent on Sunday article), but this specific name and this specific ruleset appear to be obscure. —Cel ithemis 23:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:OR, WP:NFT --Selket ^Talk 00:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If this is not a notable topic how come the university Socialization network Facebook have a group on it with over 2,500 members for all over the world who have heard of it which is linked directly to the Ride shotgun group of the same site. And also how come i am able to find many websites about the rules if it is WP:NFT??? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bonkers bassist (talk • contribs) 09:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC).— Bonkers bassist (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Comment: Facebook has groups for thousands of topics that are of some minor interest to some people but haven't been covered by reliable sources enough to meet WP:ATT. Can you show that any of the websites has a fact-checking staff and any kind of peer review process to make them a valid way to verify anything? Or are all those websites just WP:NFT in their own right, from which nothing is proven except that people amuse themselves with unencyclopedic playing around with this topic? Barno 00:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The Site i referenced has a peer review system, also the ride shotgun wiki references bored.com which does not have a peer review system or to my knowledge fact checking staff Bonkers bassist

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.