Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yechiel Jacobson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:05, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yechiel Jacobson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a noted speaker in Israel but fails WP:BIO due to lack of secondary coverage. The page is a poor translation from the Hebrew ("Most of his time he devotes to work with youth that date hair loss"?) and has been unreferenced since its inception. A PROD was deleted by the page creator without addressing the issue of no BLP references. Yoninah (talk) 22:34, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. —Yoninah (talk) 22:34, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing on GS, GB, GN. Also, the article is gobbledygook. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Entirely unsourced, appears to be some sort of an automated translation, and is essentially unreadable. Google searching does not yield anything substantial to indicate notability under either of WP:GNG, WP:BIO or WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 00:11, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Apparently, the subject's name was transliterated into English, which is why nothing can be found for him. His name is really Yechiel Yaakovson, and he is quoted by many sources in this Google search. But the page as it stands now is gobblygook, as Xxanthippe so aptly put it. Yoninah (talk) 12:43, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but there are no cites on GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:24, 24 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.