Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yatango

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If someone want to add a mention to the Optus page, properly cited of course, feel free to do so. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:21, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yatango[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This business would appear to fail the notability guidelines for business entities.
It has an Australian Business Number, but its Australian Company Number does not identify it an Public Company listed on the ASX. Australian businesses are required to have ABNs. Some Public Companies listed on the ASX may fail WP:CORPDPTH
This business has had some mentions in reliable sources. Those mentions do not appear to support the test of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Shirt58 (talk) 11:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I tend to agree. The article has clearly been created by their marketing department (or person). Deb (talk) 13:04, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:27, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Might become Notable in the future, but not now. The only stories about it relate to just startup news. Not encyclopedic. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:07, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If deleted then it should at least be mentioned in passing on the Optus page (as it uses their network) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.44.64.30 (talk) 02:05, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:ORG was started in 2012 maybe notable in the future.It can mentioned in the Optus page but not notable for separate article.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:58, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.