Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yash Dongre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Anita Dongre. A quick explanation. Based on numbers, there was one keep, two deletes, and including the nom's original intentions, three redirects. But numbers not being everything, the policy objections placed fell gently in the general direction of redirection. The keep was, unfortunately, although re-emphasised, based on a fundamental misundersatnding of the purpose of an online encyclopaedia. One delete was based firmly and convincingly on policy; the other based on the (promotional) tone of the article. To this, WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP may be seen to apply. Finally, the three !votes for redirect presented the cleanest and, per WP:ATD, most logical result. (non-admin closure) — fortunavelut luna 13:48, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yash Dongre[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Typical promotional work.Tried to redirect to Anita Dongre which was repeatedly reverted.Most of the sources contain no mention/trivial mention of the subject.Lone pseudo-importance seems to be that he is set to speak at UN Young Changemakers Conclave--a non-notable initiative of United Nations Information Centre for India and Bhutan. Winged Blades^Godric 15:53, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Winged Blades^Godric 15:56, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Winged Blades^Godric 15:56, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Winged Blades^Godric 15:56, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I would like to mention that this article is about an entrepreneur who is heading HOAD, the brand who's clothes are being worn by the Royal Duchess and major celebrities, the page is in compliance with all the policies laid out by wikipedia. The article was created with notable sources, and shows the exact figure of the subject, I recommend that this article should stay at wikipedia as the person is notable, however as you have mentioned, that he only spoke at UN, that's not true, through his philanthropy he has changed 5000 lives. What I would recommed that for the time being let's add this article to the category of a Wikipedia:Stub , therefore people would be able to add more things to the article.

https://www.outlookbusiness.com/specials/outstanding-women/empress-of-prt-3076 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shailaggarwal (talk • contribs) 16:55, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by working for one's mother's company, nor from the clients who purchase goods from that company. Nor do the other activities listed in the article indicate distinct biographical notability. Fails WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 18:04, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : Referring to the article:

Where Notability is inherited:- " Individuals in close, personal relationships with famous people (including politicians) can have an independent article even if they are known solely for such a relationship, but only if they pass WP:GNG" WP:GNG Pass "Significant coverage" : The subject in the article has significant coverage in the news articles "Reliable" & "Sources" : The sources are from known media house. "Independent of the subject" : The article does not include any links from the subject's website. "Presumed" : The subject is notable by blood and the also designation which he holds in the company (for example: There a page for Sundar Pichai, CEO google)

I have made my case for retaining this article, I hope I have justified that I was in compliance with all the points laid out by the wikipedia and therefore this page must be retained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shailaggarwal (talk • contribs) 21:19, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 23:46, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is ridiculously self promotional piece on Wikipedia, even go through Media coverage, nothing profound is found. Light2021 (talk) 20:17, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Anita Dongre. No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. All the current sources in the article are just mentions of him being Anita Dongre's son and being a part of her business; he is not notable on his own and notability is not WP:NOTINHERITED. Bennv3771 (talk) 07:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Anita Dongre: All the media attention he has received is because of his work for his mother's company. Sources don't discuss him in detail. --Skr15081997 (talk) 12:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.