Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaesu FT-290R

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Yaesu (brand). Daniel (talk) 10:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yaesu FT-290R (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a stub article, but I can’t see that there is anything notable about this product, despite the claim it was one of the first models to feature both SSB and FM modes in a portable unit. A notability tag has been attached since 2008; there was PROD in 2011 because of this but this was challenged and it didn’t progress to a discussion at that time. There are no primary sources used but the improvement tag that had been placed on the page in 2011 was mis-spelled. There hasn’t been any further substantial work on the page. Suggest delete or perhaps merge to Yaesu (brand) article. Drchriswilliams (talk) 13:36, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Amateur radio has been notified about this debate. • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 19:09, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.