Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaboom Toys
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 08:42, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yaboom Toys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to be a notable toy company. Article has no references, a web search brings up a few hits such as an Amazon product listing here, but otherwise an awful lot of unreliable stuff. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:36, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nominator for a CSD attempt which failed. MIVP - (Can I Help?) (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) 13:14, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:55, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources in over 5 years, therefore fails Wikipedia:No reliable sources, no verifiability, no article DavidTTTaylor (talk) 16:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.