Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yabbie Schniztel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. But can it be a hoax if it is tasty? czar 21:41, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yabbie Schniztel[edit]

Yabbie Schniztel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTCOOKBOOK just another recipe article Sulaimandaud (talk) 06:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - No references. No indication of notability. Just here to give the author an entry in Wikipedia. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:40, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 10:58, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 10:58, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I lean towards hoax. Doctorhawkes (talk) 01:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I could find no sources whatever. Fails WP:GNG. I agree a hoax looks likely, as I tried just looking up "yabbie recipes." What I found mostly was variants of boiling and saucing - nothing at all like this recipe article proposes. WP:NOTCOOKBOOK. Geoff | Who, me? 22:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.