Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaaruku Yaaro (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Yunshui  09:06, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yaaruku Yaaro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This film is under sourced and not notable. This page was created for a film that has highly negative reviews and has been mocked by other films. DragoMynaa (talk) 05:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 05:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 05:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. A bad review is still a review and contributes towards establishing notability. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 06:09, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment I agree with Eastmain. I havent performed the search yest, but the "critical reception" section in article is unsourced. There some interesting arguments in previous AfD, but they were not based on policies. I am totally in for bypassing the bureaucracy on the basis of WP:Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy, as long as it can be proven what was claimed in previous AfD (December 2009). The film doesnt pass the WP:NFILM. As I didnt perform a search yet, I dont know if the film passes WP:GNG. In case it doesnt, it can be selectively merged with lead actor Sam Anderson (Tamil actor)'s article, who currently has a stub-class article. —usernamekiran (talk) 12:03, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:25, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 02:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.