Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yū Kamonomiya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:36, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yū Kamonomiya[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

ANN search results:

1) Takuya Kamikita (Little Busters - minor role)

2) Young Kyosuke (Little Busters - minor role)

No lead roles to speak of; subject is not notable in the least. Subject also has no news coverage nor secondary sources to assert her notability; fails both WP:GNG and WP:ENT. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (talk · contribs) 13:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —MRD2014 (talk · contribs) 13:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject is not covered in any reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 15:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment "Why propose a deletion, when you could just jump right into the AFD process? Yes, I'm not supposed to make any more AFDs at this current moment, but seeing as someone else has already proposed a deletion, I might as well speed up the process." - (Sk8erPrince) This is because it causes more work for the admin, you also didnt speed anything up. Had you not removed the proposed deletion, this article would have been deleted on 13:19, 7 October 2016. Now because this is an AfD discussion, and lasts 7 days you extended it to October the 10th. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Getting people to agree with the deletion is what I want to see. That justifies my reasons, and makes deleting the page worthwhile. It's a sense of fulfillment. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 01:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And might I add, that if anyone deleted your proposed deletion tag, nobody could post the same tag again? You never know who might do that. According to the PROD page, "Any editor (including the article's creator) may object to the deletion by simply removing the tag; this action permanently cancels the proposed deletion via PROD."

That means even trolls could remove it if they so desire, leaving AFD as the only option for deletion. AFD is a much better way of handling this, so that nobody could trample with the proper deletion process. By the sounds of it, you honestly sound like you're in a hurry to get rid of this article. What's the big rush? I could wait three more days to see it get shut down, and I'm pretty sure those that were and will get involved in this AFD could make reasonable, strong points to explain why this article deserves to be deleted. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 03:49, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Only Little Busters! is a noted role in ANN. That's about it. And the "young" version is as a supporting character. The main characters are grown up for the series. ANN. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete For the record nobody would have contested the PROD, this article has no indication of notability. When someone contests a PROD they are expected to show sources/meet the prodder's concerns. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:03, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How would you know? Trolls lurk everywhere on Wikipedia. You can't be absolutely certain. However, I am glad that you voted "Delete". --Sk8erPrince (talk) 00:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the Prod tag could be removed on any given circumstance. That's why I'm afraid that trolls would take advantage of that. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 07:23, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.