Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xiklab Digital

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Xiklab Digital

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NCORP- coverage is of routine events or from non-reliable sources. COI concerns regarding article creator. 1292simon (talk) 00:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Impressive client list, but that doesn’t make them notable. I don’t see anything that isn’t just an account of normal agency life per WP:MILL. Mccapra (talk) 06:06, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The article needs to be trimmed down, notably merging or removing the pre-Xiklab content. However, most of the sources in the article are reliable, including [1], [2] and [3]. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:NCORP. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This seems like a pretty run of the mill article about a pretty run of the mill company that is just going about its business. Which is reflected in the fact that the article is just made up of "they merged with another and expanded." Both things are extremely trivial and not notable. Companies merge and expand. Its what they do and 99% of the time there's nothing particularly special about it, but especially not in this case. "Merge and expand" seem to be what all the sources are about also. Which means they do not establish anything about the company. Except that it exists. So, in no way does the article pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A quick Google search returns 6,940 results only, which is already an indicator that it's very likely to fail WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Even the sources in the article are mostly promotional. HiwilmsTalk 07:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.