Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xiaguan tea factory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:40, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Xiaguan tea factory[edit]

Xiaguan tea factory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's possible to verify that the Xiaguan tea factory exists[1][2] but that's about it. This article is based entirely on a livejournal post. No significant, in-depth coverage in independent sources. This could be a really interesting subject but we can't be sure if all the details in this article are even real, or are made up. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not enough information here to confirm notability. Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:38, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Fails WP:GNG. No references to say why it's important. What sets it apart from an ordinary tea company that we wouldn't cover? Nothing, therefore it truly is not notable enough for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Red Phoenix talk 22:45, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.