Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xfers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 04:48, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Xfers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

high degree of promotions. Coverage on Popular media are just for Investments of Script writing/ Coverage. Similar to larger scale Grofer, Delhivery, and other startup story. it is not notable at all. Till now. Light2021 (talk) 13:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

leaning delete There's some RSes in there, but it all appears to be promotional crystal-ball aspirations: the company putting itself forward as something that will achieve something. There's no coverage that doesn't appear to be company-initiated. A cull to RSes would be much shorter. Is there any coverage of the company that doesn't appear to be initiated by the company? - David Gerard (talk) 18:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- corporate spam on an unremarkable private company. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:33, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as advertising and this alone, the accounts involved all only focuses with this one article and the information & sources are all advertising the company, it's not substance but that's because it's all unimprovable advertising (something we delete, not keep or attempt to unconvincingly improve). SwisterTwister talk 06:14, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:12, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a small startup which recently started in Block71. All news has been in a bunch of tech blogs and solely about seed funding, hardly anything about the actual product. Sources like TechInAsia are pretty well affiliated to companies here. There's scant coverage in any reliable mainstream media. It is also interest that the article creator's intention was to promote stuff on Wikipedia (See this). Delete as Wikipedia is not supposed to be used for promotion and neither should we encourage it. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:17, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.