Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xboy (2 nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Those citing crystal ball have enough grounds here since there is a total absence of any kind of proof that such a thing has ever been considered. -Splashtalk 02:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rant speculation and see previous deletion debate Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Xboy. Unfortunately, the current article does not meet a speedy criteria, non-notable allegations just don't belong in an encyclopedia. --Mysidia (talk) 16:31, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Actually, the article does meet speedy criteria. Tagged for recreation of deleted material (CSD G4). SYCTHOStalk 16:45, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not a repost... CSD G4 refers to content that actually reached a delete consensus or had a legitimate CSD; in any case, it doesn't apply to this. --Mysidia (talk) 17:38, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete CSD G4. Rumors, heh. feydey 17:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not a speedy deletion, unfortunately. CSD:G4 only allows re-deletion of something which was already deleted by AFD or other consensus. This article was originally speedied; it must still meet a criterion for speedy deletion in order to be deleted again. It doesn't. That said, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so delete. Stifle 16:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a real thing; keep. Not speculation. WikiFanatic 23:45, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This article isn't completely baseless. What about Halo 3, then? It's on wikipedia too. --Fire 19:36, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. When the rumors become reality, then someone can write an article that is verifiable. —Cleared as filed. 23:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.