Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X (Nonpoint album)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:39, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- X (Nonpoint album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The AllMusic entry has no review. The other four refs are WP:ROUTINE and there is no indication the album meets any notability criteria. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:40, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:05, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:05, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Found a couple third-party reviews. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 07:41, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Looks like they were both removed by Sixty Minute Limit (talk · contribs). https://www.sputnikmusic.com/review/77839/Nonpoint-X/ is a user review. http://www.ghostcultmag.com/album-review-nonpoint-x-spinefarm/ didn't appear to be a RS (Proudly powered by WordPress). Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:59, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Walter Görlitz: Thanks for clarifying that. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:51, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - Just added Background, Critical reception and Chart positions with references. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:40, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Walter Görlitz: Thanks for clarifying that. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:51, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Weak keep, sources are more about the songs than the album proper, but the fact that the album has charted is a valid assertation of notability. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:59, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Reply - It would be difficult to review an album without reviewing the songs, the reviewers review close to one half dozen of the tunes, so I think this passes for what we are doing. But thanks! --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:12, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, fits notability as a charting album. ~SML • TP 16:37, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- That criteria states it may be notable, not that it is notable. With that said, the new sources do show it is notable. I'm happy to withdraw. Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:29, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.