Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XOOM Energy (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. GB fan 16:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

XOOM Energy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability for this company. Article added by banned paid editor, Wikifan115. The references are straight press releases, marked as such. Kept at the previous AfD because not enough interest was paid to it. DGG ( talk ) 23:03, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. This article is unambiguously promotional.- tucoxn\^talk 22:45, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 17:34, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete fails WP:CORP. lacks third party sources. LibStar (talk) 11:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.