Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XDEATHSTARx
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep — Caknuck 19:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable band, no sources, reads like a band bio (I mean like the one they'd write for themselves) -N 18:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep I'll admit I'm somewhat of a deletionist when it comes to bands, but this looks like they JUST meet WP:BAND. They've played throughout the state of California, just doing a Google search for "xDEATHSTARx" comes up with 58,000+ hits, and they are on a label which meets WP:MUSIC. Wildthing61476 18:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above, funny how metal bands seem incredibly commonplace in AfD's... Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 18:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Kind of edgy on this one, but Christian rock bands tend to be a bit difficult to define unless they're leaning into the mainstream. I'd be more comfortable seeing more than six Google News Archives references to them and more outside coverage, but again, Christian band. They are touring nationally at present, so I think that, combined with the Facedown Records album make this a weak keep. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Meets notability criterion 4 as stated above, and arguably criteria 1 and 5 as well. The album reviews look like sources to me - Zeibura (Talk) 21:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Very surprised keep per the above. Needs sources, though. --Haemo 23:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.