Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XConsortium
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:54, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- XConsortium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One line article. A bit short of useful information, and doesnt seem to be notable in its own right. Rathfelder (talk) 22:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 22:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- Merge to EdX. Mccapra (talk) 05:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - does not meet WP:GNG: has not "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - also, Wikipedia:One sentence does not an article make - Epinoia (talk) 02:14, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete There is no significant content to merge here (as Epinoia has stated). Only press releases and WP:PRIMARY references come out in searches, does not meet WP:GNG. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:49, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.