Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XBlast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:22, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

XBlast

XBlast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Contested PROD. My PROD rationale was: "Video game fails WP:CORP. No independent sources cited, none added since January." Contested with comment: "removed prod as the reason given talks about organizations, not computer games." Note that WP:CORP also covers products and services. Anyway, due to lack of secondary sources with in-depth coverage, it fails WP:N. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 09:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Delete Yeah, it's got resources. Thing is, it needs some ghits to prove verifiablilty. I'll Google it and see what I can get. Passed the ghits test. Still fails WP:CORP though.--Gp75motorsports 11:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

• Also, this discussion is now closed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gp75motorsports (talk • contribs) 10:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• The nominator asks for a relisting to generate a more thorough discussion. --B. Wolterding 17:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman 03:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Not every piece of software under X11 is notable, and this is not such a software package. Need a notability demonstration to change my mind. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I am also failed to find independent sources to assert notability. Carlosguitar 08:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.