Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-Boxin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:04, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

X-Boxin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is very promotional, and doesn't appear to be much in the way of in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources and those included in the article are questionable at best (Burmese language references that are mostly primary/mostly deceive and some patently unreliable.), and also have many multiple issues in article/ Strong COI/Paid concern...see talk page. MyanmarBBQ (talk) 11:49, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 14:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 14:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Blatantly self-promotional material for non-notable rapper with no independent in-depth coverage, only ever appeared in an insignificant chart. Fails WP:NMUSIC. Could easily have been speedy deleted as unambiguous promotion as it appears to have been created by the person himself, as well as for being an unremarkable musician."KoKoChitChit" (talk) 15:25, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 04:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Way too promotional in tone and style.TH1980 (talk) 04:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.