Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wyzo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wyzo[edit]

Wyzo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability, laundry list of PR and other issues. ViperSnake151  Talk  02:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Just corporate promotion for non-notable quasi-vaporware. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:48, 18 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete delete 1. notability fails GNG, 2. promotion WP:NOTPROMO. Widefox; talk 21:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I am not finding evidence that this browser attained notability. It had been previously suggested on the article Talk page that the brief product reviews on Techcrunch and Lifehacker constituted notable coverage, whereas I regard them as simply the coverage which any new product needs at launch and not evidence of attained notability. Fails WP:NSOFT, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 09:44, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.