Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wyoming e Academy of Virtual Education
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:01, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Wyoming e Academy of Virtual Education (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advertisement. No independent sources. Night of the Big Wind talk 13:52, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wyoming-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Per Wikipedia:Notability (high schools). Northamerica1000(talk) 10:04, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm just curious, Night of the Big Wind, but how many of these schools have you requested deletion for? --GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 23:15, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I worked on this about four years ago. It's a real high school, and passes both the relevant high school notability guideline we have, and well as my own standards. I am surprised that the nominator didn't check online sources or links to user pages, ahem, before nominating this article for deletion. Bearian (talk) 20:04, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- O.K. In a very short time, I found and added some citations (although one appears to be a press release that was on Yahoo news). I am sure this can be built up more with a bit of effort. Bearian (talk) 20:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – sufficient sources are available to meet WP:GNG. We delete when sources are not available not because they have not been added to the page. TerriersFan (talk) 21:08, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Suggest speedy close as keep, as original nominator Issues with sourcing and advertising style are solved. Worthy article now. Night of the Big Wind talk 21:12, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.