Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wu Sheng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wu Sheng[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable professional gamer. Ridernyc (talk) 05:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep interview by phoenix television (first one to appear on mainstream media) Redefining history (talk) 09:33, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

a 30 second interview is far from significant coverage in reliable sources. I'm going to go ahead and bring this up here. Do you have any connection to these players or any other possible conflict of interest? Ridernyc (talk) 16:32, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no, i have no connections to the players itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redefining history (talk • contribs) 00:44, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lack of reliable, third party sources. Notability not established. (I don't think a singular TV interview is enough. If there's some sort of subsection in the notability guidelines that says that a single TV appearance is enough for notability, I would change my mind though.) Sergecross73 msg me 13:29, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note These debates are being discussed off wiki here [1] I now know why so SPA's have been active on these pages. Ridernyc (talk) 01:22, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence they meet the GNG or are notable. -DJSasso (talk) 18:44, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. One interview does not notability make - but WP:USUAL applies here as well, in that coverage in this area is increasing significantly. That doesn't mean it's to the level of our requirements, yet - but it may get there eventually. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 19:36, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The subject fails the GNG. Are there any reliable sources any proponent wishes to cite, not counting gaming blogs? Ravenswing 13:26, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That depends. If gaming non-blogs (media companies) are considered gaming blogs. Like pchome.net, sgamer.com and 178.com. Well, I have nothing to say. Note: pchone.net doesnt even focus on games. However, if otherwise, I have tons of sources from these websites, and maybe more. Redefining history (talk) 02:52, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.