Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wu Chang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wu Chang[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Orphaned page, no reference, can't find any information. Timmyshin (talk) 17:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 21:13, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 21:13, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 21:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 21:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not even clear who it is: as it suggests the name is easily confused and without further information such as nature or detail of his works, his name in Chinese or where he lived it is impossible to identify him. A search turns up lots of other people with matching or partially matching names.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 22:06, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Like JohnBlackburne, I'm not sure who this is. Difficult to research notability, not even sure this particular person exists. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:40, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- This is a largely useless stub. No objection to re-creation if there is something substantial to say or an image to be added. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:32, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

comment Found one source: [1]. But it says little, only he is the son of someone called Wu Zhen, but clearly not our Wu Zhen as there are centuries between them.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 17:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 20:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.