Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Written on Her

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:33, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Written on Her[edit]

Another version of this article was deleted in AFD a week ago but an admin declined deleting this one so here it is in AFD. Again. Non-charting, non-notable song; fails WP:NSONGS. TheJazzDalek (talk) 22:34, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —TheJazzDalek (talk) 22:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~G4 I fail to see what's so decline-worthy. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 22:44, 12 May 2009 (UTC)~~ Fine. Delete Not an individually notable song, insufficient sourcing. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 15:52, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. It hath been written already! Eddie.willers (talk) 01:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the previous result was "redirect to Birdman (rapper)", this could be implemented again without an AfD. Speedy delete criteria do not apply in this case, as we have a track from a notable band, so the delete proposers will have to give a better justification. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:01, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SilkTork *^YES! 19:20, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.