Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Writing Process Phase 3: Revise, Proofread, Evaluate
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 10:22, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Writing Process Phase 3: Revise, Proofread, Evaluate[edit]
- Writing Process Phase 3: Revise, Proofread, Evaluate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Essay. Not an encyclopedia article. It looks like it's probably copied from the cited work, but let's just remove it instead of suggesting a rewrite. Woogee (talk) 23:05, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTHOW. In addition, we already have an article Writing process that covers the topic in a somewhat more encyclopedic fashion. Every pedagogue who discusses this sort of thing does so in much the same terms, so articles based on all the particular "systems" are unnecessary. Deor (talk) 14:09, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm now wondering whether the nominator would like to add the related article Writing process phase 2 to this AfD. If not, I'll prod it or nominate it separately. Deor (talk) 16:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete obviously inappropriate, and probably copypaste. (Phase 2... has now been separately nominated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Writing process phase 2) DGG ( talk ) 17:44, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.